LiDAR and pointcloud extension pt 3

Digging a little deeper. Ran the chipper on a smaller number of points and then am doing a little hacking to get height per chip (if you start to get lost, go to Paul Ramsey’s tutorial). Here’s my pipeline file. Note the small chipper size– 20 points per chip. Easy enough to load (though slow for the sake of the chip size): Now we can … Continue reading LiDAR and pointcloud extension pt 3

LiDAR and pointcloud extension

Paul Ramsey has a great tutorial on using the pointcloud extension with PostgreSQL / PostGIS: http://workshops.boundlessgeo.com/tutorial-lidar/ You can get point cloud and all that goodness running a variety of ways. Probably the easiest is to download OpenGeo Suite from Boundless: http://boundlessgeo.com/solutions/opengeo-suite/download/ If you are an Ubuntu user, try a docker instance to run PostGIS with PDAL, pointcloud, etc in a container: https://github.com/vpicavet/docker-pggis Also, I’m working … Continue reading LiDAR and pointcloud extension

Landscape Position: Conclusion? (part 2)

From earlier post: “I’ve managed to pilot most of a fast high resolution landscape position workflow with PovRay as my magic tool. The final steps I hope to pipe through PostGIS Raster. In the meantime a screenshot and description: blues are riparian, raw ocre, etc upland categories, grey is mostly flat lake plain and mid slopes, all derived from just a high res DEM input … Continue reading Landscape Position: Conclusion? (part 2)

Landscape Position: Conclusion?

I’ve managed to pilot most of a fast high resolution landscape position workflow with PovRay as my magic tool. The final steps I hope to pipe through PostGIS Raster. In the meantime a screenshot and description: blues are riparian, raw ocre, etc upland categories, grey is mostly flat lake plain and mid slopes, all derived from just a high res DEM input (no hydro lines … Continue reading Landscape Position: Conclusion?

Dialog– What qualifies as a benchmark? Part 1

Normally, my blog is a bit of a monologue.  It’s not a bad thing, but can be a little lonely.  Every now and then I get a great (and often doubtful) comments, which enhances things considerably. What follows is some dialog about the LiDAR shootout series, largely between Etienne and Pierre, posted with their permission: Pierre: “Etienne, Stephen, “I really appreciate the benchmark work you … Continue reading Dialog– What qualifies as a benchmark? Part 1

LiDAR Shootout! — New Chart, Final Results

In reviewing the final numbers and charts from Etienne and Pierre, above are the results we see.  The only revision is a moderate increase in speed for the PG Raster query. Final results in speed for lastools– ~350,000 points per second.  In other words– off-the-charts fast.  And the initial RMSE of ~25 feet was a mistake– it is probably closer to 0.2 feet. Stay tuned … Continue reading LiDAR Shootout! — New Chart, Final Results

LiDAR Shootout!

For a couple of months now I’ve been corresponding with Etienne Racine and Pierre Racine out of Montreal Laval University in Quebec City.  They decided to take on the problem of finding the speed and accuracy of a number of different techniques for extracting canopy height from LiDAR data.  They have been kind enough to allow me to post the results here.  This will be … Continue reading LiDAR Shootout!

Multi-Ring Buffers in PostGIS– Prep for Landuse Analysis

If we want to understand the factors affecting the quality of an ecological resource, adjacency is important. Adjacent land use and the fossil fuel inputs relative to keeping a land use in its current use seem to have strong correlation with, e.g. wetland quality.  I’ll have a deeper post on this with some citations, but this relatively simple process of analysis is called Landscape Development … Continue reading Multi-Ring Buffers in PostGIS– Prep for Landuse Analysis